In the middle of 2025's escalating trade wars, the Supreme Court is facing a decision that could reshape the entire tariff landscape—and gold traders are watching. The case challenges whether IEEPA, a statute designed for national emergencies, really grants the President the power to slap a 10% baseline tariff on nearly every U.S. trading partner plus country-specific surcharges. We're talking trillions in trade and core congressional taxing authority here. The major questions and non-delegation doctrines are in play, and the outcome matters.
A Supreme Court case on IEEPA tariffs could reshape trade policy—and gold markets are paying close attention.
If the Court upholds these IEEPA tariffs, gold probably stays strong. Validation means tariffs become a persistent policy tool, and markets hate that kind of ongoing uncertainty. Historically, trade wars and geopolitical risk drive investors toward safe havens. Gold fits that bill.
Stacking IEEPA duties with existing Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs would also keep import costs elevated, feeding inflation fears—another classic gold catalyst. The World Gold Council notes that tariff-driven uncertainty has already pushed prices higher, and an “uphold” ruling would cement that dynamic. Volatility in risk assets would likely persist, sending more money into gold ETFs and bullion as a hedge.
But what if the Court strikes down the tariffs? Short-term, gold could pull back. Removing a major legal and policy overhang would cut one pillar of safe-haven demand. Trade tensions might ease, growth expectations could tick up, and risk appetite would improve—all typically bearish for gold.
That said, the downside is probably limited and transitory. The World Gold Council is clear: gold's role as a hedge against broader macro, currency, and financial risks doesn't hinge on one legal ruling. Even without IEEPA tariffs, Section 232, Section 301, Section 338, and Section 122 tools remain on the table. The tariff toolkit isn't going anywhere. Central banks could still deploy forward guidance on future policy responses to trade disruptions, influencing currency valuations and reinforcing gold's defensive positioning. Any major policy shift affecting trade flows would still generate currency price fluctuations that support gold's safe-haven appeal. Central banks maintain significant influence over forex markets through monetary policy implementation and direct intervention, which can amplify gold's appeal during periods of currency instability.
